Question

Directions: Refer to the DC Sniper Case at:...

Directions:  Refer to the DC Sniper Case  at: (https://bja.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh186/files/Publications/SniperRpt.pdf) to answer each of the following questions.

 

2. Discuss two investigative lessons learned from this case and how they have helped the role of a criminal investigator and police departments in their entirety.

Answer & Explanation
Verified Solved by verified expert

Discuss two investigative lessons learned from this case and how they have helped the role of a criminal investigator and police departments in their entirety.

 

            The proper management of information was one of the most important lessons acquired from this instance. While assuring that the information received is examined and that the appropriate people are notified, when many agencies are involved, information might be misplaced or not be given to the appropriate person in a timely manner. This also applies to all police departments and investigators, since information in each case, no matter how big or small, is significant and can aid in the resolution of the case quickly. Another investigative lesson learnt from this case is the need for effective communication. This was emphasized by every law enforcement official involved in this investigation. Communication is essential, whether across agencies or between individuals within the same department, to ensure that no matter how vital the information is, it is delivered to the appropriate people in a timely manner. This ensures that whoever is in charge of or directing an inquiry has all of the facts available before reaching a conclusion on a case.

Step-by-step explanation

            One of the most essential takeaways from this investigation was determining roles and responsibilities in a complex investigation. This case prompted federal and local law enforcement to work together, something they had previously only done half-heartedly. Each agency must recognize that other agencies possess expertise and resources that they do not. Roles evolved when supervisors were compelled to assist in investigations owing to the impending deadline.

 

            The second lesson to be drawn from this incident is the need for proper information flow management. According to Murphy et al. (2004), good information management is important to the success of a large-scale investigation. Tips, intelligence, and other essential information must be effectively gathered, evaluated, and disseminated by the agencies concerned. The existence of many agencies undoubtedly complicates an investigation, but it may also increase the amount of potentially relevant material. The sniper case demonstrated the importance of a centralized management system for information collection and delivery across all authorities involved in an investigation. This result in a more efficient flow of information, ensuring that leads and tips are not lost and extraneous material is removed.

 

            The last lesson will be about planning and being prepared before a problem arises. It is recommended that organizations create plans and procedures well in advance of an event. Planning ahead of time may help with things like interviewing, erecting barriers, and controlling crime scenes. While their preparations may not be sufficient for the situations that develop, they do provide a critical foundation for future improvements. Another way to prepare is to get into partnerships with other organizations to share information and resources. When an event occurs, it aids in the reduction of conflict and the promotion of efficiency (Murphy et al., 2004).

 

 

References

Murphy, G., Wexler, C., Davies, H., & Plotkin, M. (2004). Managing a Multijurisdictional Case: Identifying the Lessons Learned from the Sniper Investigation. Police Executive Research Forum.