Two of the more highly debated issues in life-span development psychology today are continuity versus discontinuity and nature versus nurture.
At the heart of the
continuity versus discontinuity debate lies the question of whether development is solely and evenly continuous, or whether it is marked by age-specific periods. Developmentalists who advocate the
continuous model describe development as a relatively smooth process, without sharp or distinct stages, through which an individual must pass. Meanwhile, supporters of the
discontinuous model describe development as a series of discrete
stages, each of which is characterized by at least one task that an individual must accomplish before progressing to the next
stage. For example, Freud, in his stage model of
psychosexual development, theorized that children systematically move through oral, anal, phallic, and latency stages before reaching mature adult sexuality in the genital stage. Theories of human development, according to Freud and Erikson, appear in Table
1 . Table
2 shows Piaget's stages of cognitive development, and Table
3 outlines Levinson's stages of passage from age 17 to 65 and over.
TABLE 1
Theories of Developmental Stages, per Freud and Erikson
Period (Age)
Freud's Stages
Erikson's Task or Crisis
Infancy (0–1)
Oral
Trust vs. mistrust
Toddlerhood and early childhood (1–3)
Anal
Autonomy vs. shame
Early childhood (3–6)
Phallic
Initiative vs. guilt
Middle childhood (7–11)
Latency
Industry vs. inferiority
Adolescence (12–19)
Genital
Identity vs. confusion
Early adulthood (20–45)
Intimacy vs. isolation
Middle adulthood (45–65)
Generativity vs. stagnation
Late adulthood (65+)
Integrity vs. despair
TABLE 2
Piaget's Stages of Cognitive Development
Stage
Age
Characteristics of Stage
Sensorimotor
0–2
The child learns by doing: looking, touching, sucking. The child also has a primitive understanding of cause-and-effect relationships. Object permanence appears around 9 months.
Preoperational
2–7
The child uses language and symbols, including letters and numbers. Egocentrism is also evident. Conservation marks the end of the preoperational stage and the beginning of concrete operations.
Concrete Operations
7–11
The child demonstrates conservation, reversibility, serial ordering, and a mature understanding of cause-and-effect relationships. Thinking at this stage is still concrete.
Formal Operations
12+
The individual demonstrates abstract thinking, including logic, deductive reasoning, comparison, and classification.
TABLE 3
Levinson's Theory of Human Development
Age
Stage
17–33
Novice phase of early adulthood
17–22
Early adult transition
22–28
Entering the adult world
28–33
Age-30 transition
33–45
Culmination of early adulthood
33–40
Settling down
40–45
Midlife transition
45–50
Entering middle adulthood
50–55
Age-50 transition
55–60
Culmination of middle adulthood
60–65
Late adult transition
65+
Late adulthood
Proponents of stage theories of development also suggest that individuals go through
critical periods, which are times of increased and favored sensitivity to particular aspects of development. For example, early childhood (the first 5 years) is a critical period for language acquisition. Thus, most adults find it difficult or impossible to master a second language during their adult years while young children raised in bilingual homes normally learn second languages easily during childhood.
Experts from a variety of disciplines continue to argue over the roles that biology and the environment ultimately play in development. This centuries-old
nature-versus-nurture debate concerns the relative degree to which heredity and learning affect functioning. Both genetic traits and environmental circumstances are likely to be involved in an individual's development, although the amount each express depends on the individual and his or her circumstances. For example, some identical twins who are separated at birth develop similar personality, cognitive, and social characteristics, while other twins who are separated at birth do not. Likewise, many non-twin siblings raised in the same household develop similar characteristics, although this similar development of characteristics is not always the case with non-twin siblings. This interactional nature-versus-nurture or biology-versus-environment approach to the study of human psychological development exemplifies the multifaceted makeup of the biopsychosocial perspective.